History
  • No items yet
midpage
Covert v. Lee
256 Ga. 357
Ga.
1986
Check Treatment
Bell, Justice.

“The burden of proof in an extradition case is on the person resisting extradition once the State has made a prima facie case that the extradition is proper. Hutson v. Stoner, 244 Ga. 52 (257 SE2d 538) (1979).” Smith v. Bell, 246 Ga. 577 (272 SE2d 309) (1980). Appellant contends that the superior court erred in denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus since there was no evidence that he, Dan Covert, is the “Dan Covert” named in the Governor’s warrant. We disagree. “If he was not the person named in the Governor’s warrant, appellant had the burden to show that he was not. [Cit.] Here, the appellant did not deny that he was the person named in the Governor’s warrant.” Wollweber v. Martin, 226 Ga. 20, 23 (2) (172 SE2d 605) (1970).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Covert v. Lee
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 28, 1986
Citation: 256 Ga. 357
Docket Number: 43903
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In