Courter v. Butler

91 N.J.L. 683 | N.J. | 1918

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Tire Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.