History
  • No items yet
midpage
Couples v. Couples
623 So. 2d 585
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1993
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part and reverse in part. We reverse that part of the trial court’s order awarding the appellee “an additional $25,000 a month” beyond the other amounts allowed for temporary support, for the wife to spend “however she desires.” Cf. Wenzel v. Wenzel, 512 So.2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA1987). We affirm the balance of the temporary support order.

We also affirm the order for temporary attorney’s fees, suit money and costs. Our affirmance of these awards, however, is without prejudice to the appellant to subsequently challenge any claims for fees and costs alleged to have been actually incurred. The appellee retains the burden on this issue, regardless of the trial court’s tentative allowance of fees, suit money and costs based on estimated future expenditures.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Couples v. Couples
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 25, 1993
Citation: 623 So. 2d 585
Docket Number: Nos. 93-0894, 93-0895
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.