History
  • No items yet
midpage
County v. Clark
60 N.H. 209
| N.H. | 1880
|
Check Treatment

The examination of the accounts of the defendant as clerk of the court, by the presiding justice, was the performance of a duty imposed by statute, and the order of approval was a determination of the claims considered and allowed, in the nature of a judgment, and is a bar to this action. The statute requiring an adjustment of the defendant's account by the court does not give *Page 210 or leave to either of these parties an appeal from that adjustment by a suit at law. Supervisors v. Briggs, 2 Hill 135 — S.C., 2 Denio 26. If the settlement is erroneous, it may be reopened and corrected by proper proceedings, — by simple motion to the court and notice to the defendant; and this action may be continued in the trial term without costs to await the result. Northumberland v. Cobleigh, 59 N.H. 250, 256.

Case discharged.

FOSTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: County v. Clark
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1880
Citation: 60 N.H. 209
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.