History
  • No items yet
midpage
County v. Clark
60 N.H. 209
N.H.
1880
Check Treatment

The examination of the accounts of the defendant as clerk of the court, by the presiding justice, was the performance of a duty imposed by statute, and the order of approval was a determination of the claims considered and allowed, in the nature of a judgment, and is a bar to this action. The statute requiring an adjustment of the defendant's account by the court does not give *Page 210 or leave to either of these parties an appeal from that adjustment by a suit at law. Supervisors v. Briggs, 2 Hill 135 — S.C., 2 Denio 26. If the settlement is erroneous, it may be reopened and corrected by proper proceedings, — by simple motion to the court and notice to the defendant; and this action may be continued in the trial term without costs to await the result. Northumberland v. Cobleigh, 59 N.H. 250, 256.

Case discharged.

FOSTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: County v. Clark
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1880
Citation: 60 N.H. 209
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.