midpage

Coughlin v. StateCoughlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Mar 1, 2002
CR-00-2114
Versions:837 So. 2d 326
2002 WL 321897

COBB, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and SHAW and WISE, JJ., concur. BASCHAB, J., dissents, with opinion.

BASCHAB, Judge (dissenting).

I must respectfully dissent. The record in this case does not indicate that the trial court ever advised the appellants about the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, as required by Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and did not advise them that they had the right to withdraw any waiver of the right to counsel at any time during the proceedings, as required by Rule 6.1(b), Ala. R.Crim. P. Therefore, we should reverse the trial court‘s judgment and remand this case for a new trial. See Farid v. State, 720 So.2d 998 (Ala. Crim.App.1998); Hairgrove v. State, 680 So.2d 946 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), cert. denied, 680 So.2d 947 (Ala.1996).

Case Details

Case Name: Coughlin v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Mar 1, 2002
Citations: 837 So. 2d 326; 2002 WL 321897; CR-00-2114
Docket Number: CR-00-2114
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
Log In