midpage

Couch v. StateCouch v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals
Mar 22, 1966
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Johnson
PER CURIAM.

This record reveals convictions on pleas of guilt before indictment. Constitution 1901, Amendment 37.

*708On coram nobis the appellant did not aver or prove that he had a valid defense or that he - was innocent of the original charges.

A majority of the court considers that the judgment below must under Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 1860, 6 L.Ed.2d 1037 (147 Conn. 194, 158 A.2d 239), and Lynumn v. State of Illinois, 372 U.S. 528, 83 S.Ct. 917, 9 L.Ed.2d 922 (21 Ill.2d 63, 171 N.E.2d 17), be

Reversed.

JOHNSON, J., dissents only because of ■appellant’s failure to plead and prove a valid defense. Ex parte Taylor, 249 Ala. 667, 32 So.2d 659.

Case Details

Case Name: Couch v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 22, 1966
Citations: 198 So. 2d 308; 43 Ala. App. 707; 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 596
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
Log In