222 Mass. 433 | Mass. | 1916
The defendant corporation was charged in this action with maliciously causing the plaintiff’s arrest on mesne process. See Cotter v. Nathan & Hurst Co. 218 Mass. 315. The second trial
Two of these exceptions are to the admission of testimony that the plaintiff had been summoned before the poor debtor court five times; and a third is to the proof of the judgment obtained against him by Ada B. Boynton, in 1911. As all of this was expressly admitted only on the issue of the amount of damages, and there was no occasion for the jury to consider it when they found against the plaintiff on the issue of liability, the question of its admissibility was made immaterial by the verdict, and need not be discussed. Ducharme v. Holyoke Street Railway, 203 Mass. 384, 392.
The remaining exception is to the exclusion of an answer to a
Exceptions overruled.
The case was submitted on briefs.
Before White, J.