History
  • No items yet
midpage
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A.
131 S. Ct. 565
| SCOTUS | 2010
|
Check Treatment

*1 Cite as: 562 U. S. ____ (2010) 1 (Slip Opinion)

Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________ No. 08–1423 _________________ COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PETITIONER

v. OMEGA, S. A. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [December 13, 2010] P ER C URIAM .

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. J USTICE K AGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 13, 2010
Citation: 131 S. Ct. 565
Docket Number: 08-1423
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.