History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cossar v. Truesdale
45 A. 252
N.H.
1898
Check Treatment

There was no legal error in permitting the appellees to file their declarations under the statute relating to appeals from commissioners (P. S., c. 193, s. 7), which authorizes the court, "in cases of accident or mistake," to "allow the creditor to file his declaration or to amend it as in other civil actions." *Page 491 Parker's Appeal, 15 N.H. 24, 26; Tilton v. Tilton, 35 N.H. 430, 433; Holt v. Smart, 46 N.H. 1; Hilton v. Olcott, 58 N.H. 598, 599; Cutts v. Cutts,58 N.H. 602, 603; Bolles v. Dalton, 59 N.H. 479, 480; Kelsea v. Manchester,64 N.H. 570.

Exception overruled.

PEASLEE, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Cossar v. Truesdale
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1898
Citation: 45 A. 252
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.