History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coshocton v. Foreman
64 Ohio St. 3d 1417
Ohio
1992
Check Treatment

Coshocton County, No. 91-CA-26. On motion to consolidate with 92-387, Coshocton v. Forbes, Coshocton County, Nos. 91-CA-11, 91-CA-12, 91-CA-15 and 91-CA-20. Motion denied; sua sponte, the motion to certify in 92-387 is overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Coshocton v. Foreman
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 24, 1992
Citation: 64 Ohio St. 3d 1417
Docket Number: 92-649
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.