History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corwein v. Hames
11 Johns. 76
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1814
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The interest of the justice was too remote and contingent to be regarded in this case. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.(a)

1 Johns. Rep. 486.

Case Details

Case Name: Corwein v. Hames
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1814
Citation: 11 Johns. 76
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.