History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corr v. Philadelphia
212 Pa. 123
Pa.
1905
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam,

An abandonment of land appropriated by a municipality for public use cannot be established by proof merely of a failure for the time to use it, or of a temporary use of it not inconsistent with an intention to use it for the purpose for which it was taken, or another public purpose. The facts alleged in support of the averment of abandonment do not strengthen it. But there is a distinct averment of an actual abandonment of any intention to use the land for any public purpose. This we think was a sufficiently well pleaded abandonment to put the city to a defense. The order sustaining the demurrer and entering judgment for the defendant is reversed with leave to the defendant to answer.

Case Details

Case Name: Corr v. Philadelphia
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 15, 1905
Citation: 212 Pa. 123
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 53
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.