44 So. 549 | Ala. | 1907
The bill in this case was filed under the statute (Code 1896, § 809) to quiet the title to land. It fails to aver that there was no suit pending in regard
Undoubtedly, the chancellor could well have dismissed the bill without more, since it fails to even suggest a substantial and material averment necessary to give it equity; and he could during term time have set aside the decree, on application of complainant, for- the purpose of having the bill amended so as to give it equity. So likewise he could have extended this privilege for 20 days. All this was within his irrevisable discretion.
It follows that the appeal should be dismissed.