History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cornwell v. State
179 Ga. 668
Ga.
1934
Check Treatment
Russell, O. J.

The evidence of the guilt of the accused is entirely circumstantial, and is so inconclusive as not to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices oonour, except Bell, J., who dissents. Chester A. Byars, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, W. E. Connor, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy, J. T. Coree, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Cornwell v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 14, 1934
Citation: 179 Ga. 668
Docket Number: No. 10149
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.