Corning & Norton v. Pray
2 Wend. 626 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1829
The service was irregular. If the notice could not be personally served on the agent or on his clerk in his office, it should have been delivered to some one of his family. The motion is granted.
In another case, decided this term, a notice served by leaving the same in the office of agent, no one being therein, was pronounced an irregular service.