History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cornett v. Salvation Army
146 Ga. 47
Ga.
1916
Check Treatment
Beck, J.

1. In view of the entire record, it can not be said that the jury were unauthorized, under the evidence and the inferences which it was allowable for them to draw therefrom, to return the verdict rendered.

2. The special assignments of error were without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cornett v. Salvation Army
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 20, 1916
Citation: 146 Ga. 47
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.