midpage

Cornell v. DeanCornell v. Dean

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Oct 15, 1870
Reporters:
Before:
Chapman
Chapman, C. J.

Persons acquainted with the business of pasturing cattle may testify as to the price or value of pasturing, and as to its being worth more to pasture them transiently than by the season. This is a species of evidence that is applied to a great variety of transactions. Carpenter v. Wait, 11 Cush. 257. Shattuck v. Stoneham Branch Railroad Co. 6 Allen, 115. Commonwealth v. Dorsey, 103 Mass. 412. The evidence on this point was properly admitted.

Hall and the Slades were not parties to the contract between the parties to this action. They were the plaintiff’s lessors, and their rent was to be one half of the proceeds of the land, for which their claim was upon him after he should have collected the amount. The contract was unlike that in Delaney v. Root, 99 Mass. 546. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Cornell v. Dean
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1870
Citation: 105 Mass. 435
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In