History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cornelius v. Christ
230 A.D. 879
N.Y. App. Div.
1930
Check Treatment

Judgment modified so as to provide for a new trial before another justice, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. While a majority of the court are of the opinion that there was a warranty and a breach thereof, a majority of the court are also of the opinion that there was a failure to show that the plaintiff relied upon the warranty. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Crosby, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the ground that in their opinion there was sufficient evidence to justify the justice’s findings, both of warranty and reliance. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Cornelius v. Christ
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1930
Citation: 230 A.D. 879
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.