History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner
348 U.S. 911
SCOTUS
1955
Check Treatment

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented in the petition for certiorari which read as follows:

1. “Are transactions in commodity futures which are not 'true hedges’ capital asset transactions and thus subject to the limitations of Section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, or do the resulting gains and losses from such transactions give rise to ordinary income and ordinary deductions? (1940) (1942)”
2. “Are commodity futures contracts ‘securities’ and thus subject to the ‘wash sales’ provisions of Section 118 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939? (1940) (1942)”

Case Details

Case Name: Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 10, 1955
Citation: 348 U.S. 911
Docket Number: No. 457
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.