History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corley's ex'r v. Evans
67 Ky. 409
Ky. Ct. App.
1868
Check Treatment
JUDGE R0BEB.TS0N

delivered the opinion op the court:

Whether right or wrong on the facts which may have been actually exhibited in the circuit court, we cannot judicially know. Those facts do not appear in the record in a cognizable form. The document professing to state them, and styled a bill of exceptions, does not appear to have been either signed or filed in court; but, as time was allowed for completing it in vacation, the presumption is, that it was prepared and signed extra-judicially out of court, and is, therefore, according to the Code of Practice, unauthorized and void.

We are, therefore, not permitted to notice it judicially ; and, consequently, as we must, in the absence of testimony to the contrary, presume that the verdict was authorized by the proof and the judgment consequently right, we cannot reverse.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Corley's ex'r v. Evans
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Date Published: Jan 13, 1868
Citation: 67 Ky. 409
Court Abbreviation: Ky. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.