History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corey Reynolds v. State
227 So. 3d 220
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED COREY REYNOLDS,

Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-407 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County,

Raul A. Zambrano, Judge.

D. Gray Thomas, of Law Office of D. Gray

Thomas, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Corey Reynolds, appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant alleges that his counsel was ineffective for failing to pursue an involuntary intoxication defense, and that counsel incorrectly believed that an involuntary intoxication defense was unavailable to Appellant. In summarily denying the motion, the trial court reasoned *2 that “[c]ounsel made a reasonable strategic decision to present a theory of defense based on the accidental discharge of a firearm.”

Generally, a trial court may not summarily deny a rule 3.850 motion on the ground that trial counsel made a reasonable tactical decision, unless “it is so obvious from the face of the record that trial counsel’s strategy not to present a voluntary intoxication defense is very clearly a tactical decision well within the discretion of counsel.” Hannon v. State , 941 So. 2d 1109, 1138 (Fla. 2006). Based on this record alone, however, we cannot conclude that “it is so obvious . . . that trial counsel’s strategy . . . is very clearly a tactical decision well within the discretion of counsel.” Id. This is especially so given Appellant’s allegation that counsel was operating under the mistaken assumption that an involuntary intoxication defense was unavailable to Appellant. We therefore reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED for Evidentiary Hearing.

EVANDER, WALLIS, and EISNAUGLE JJ., concur.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Corey Reynolds v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 29, 2017
Citation: 227 So. 3d 220
Docket Number: Case 5D17-407
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.