History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corcoran v. Wanamaker
185 Pa. 496
Pa.
1898
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam,

There is no evidence that the defendants had any knowledge that the use of the acids complained of would produce the disease from which the plaintiff suffered, and there was no proof that it was not customary to use acids in laundries in the same manner and proportions as they were used in the laundry business conducted by the- defendants. The case was therefore destitute of the evidence necessary to establish the charge of negligence without which there could be no recovery.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Corcoran v. Wanamaker
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 11, 1898
Citation: 185 Pa. 496
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 12
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.