This is an action of tort for personal injuries commenced by plaintiffs in the District Court of Natick, Massachusetts. The ad damnum in the writ, which was
On March 14, plaintiffs filed a motion to reduce the ad damnum from $25,000 to $9,000, together with a certificate by counsel for the plaintiffs to the effect that a copy of the motion to reduce ad damnum and notice that the motion had been marked for hearing on March 22, 1961, at 9:00 a. m., had been mailed to counsel for the defendant.
During oral argument of plaintiffs’ motion to remand filed with the Clerk of this court, both counsel argued as to the legal status of this case as though the motion to reduce ad damnum had been allowed on March 22, 1961, as alleged in the motion to remand. It is elementary that argument of counsel is not evidence, and in the absence of either a certified copy of the record of the Natick District Court indicating that the motion to reduce ad damnum was, in fact, allowed, or a formal stipulation by counsel to that effect, the motion to remand is denied. However, since it has been established by the Supreme Court of the United States in Pullman Co. v. Jenkins,
