History
  • No items yet
midpage
Corcoran v. Concord & M. R.
56 F. 1014
1st Cir.
1893
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The court is of the opinion that plaintiff should have offered some evidence showing- the scope of the alleged brakeman’s authority. He failed, to do so, and for that reason it is ordered: Judgment of circuit court affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Corcoran v. Concord & M. R.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Jul 1, 1893
Citation: 56 F. 1014
Docket Number: No. 52
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.