No. 89-758 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Dec 11, 1989
The probationary split sentence imposed on appellant is not illegal. See Poore v. State, 531 So. 2d 161" court="Fla." date_filed="1988-09-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/poore-v-state-1150029?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1150029">531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988); Carter v. State, 552 So. 2d 203" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1989-06-06" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/carter-v-state-1633699?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1633699">552 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). However, the trial court did err by sentencing appellant in excess of the one-cell bump-up for probation violation. See Lambert v. State, 545 So. 2d 838" court="Fla." date_filed="1989-06-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/lambert-v-state-1750533?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1750533">545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So. 2d 851" court="Fla." date_filed="1989-06-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/franklin-v-state-1749597?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1749597">545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). Additionally, the trial court erred by failing to give appellant credit for all earned gain-time. See Green v. State, 547 So. 2d 925" court="Fla." date_filed="1989-07-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-green-1861574?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1861574">547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989); Melvin v. State, 553 So. 2d 312" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1989-12-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/melvin-v-state-1670628?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1670628">553 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED in part, and REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for the purpose of