History
  • No items yet
midpage
Copeland & Son v. Stephens
50 S.E. 976
Ga.
1905
Check Treatment
Cobb, J.

The verdict rendered in the justice’s court is not altogether satisfactory, but there is some evidence upon which the finding might have been based, and the discretion of the judge of the superior court, exercised in overruling the certiorari, will not be interfered with.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Candler, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Copeland & Son v. Stephens
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 15, 1905
Citation: 50 S.E. 976
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.