Cooper v. SelskyCooper v. Selsky
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. The misbehavior report, positive test results and supporting documentation provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Dunn v Selsky,
Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.