Cooper v. GoordCooper v. Goord
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance, interfering with an employee, harassment and refusing a direct order. The misbehavior report relates that while being interviewed by a counselor regarding an objection of completing his quarterly review, petitioner became
Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, we find that the Hearing Officer conducted a fair and impartial hearing. We reject petitioner’s assertion that he was denied relevant documentary evidence inasmuch as he failed to request the material until after the Hearing Officer rendered his disposition (see, Matter of Infante v Johnson,
To the extent petitioner claims that he was denied the right to present a witness who would present mitigating evidence which would lessen the penalty imposed, we note that petitioner failed to request such witness during the hearing (see, Matter of Hodge v Goord,
Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.