Cooney v. Rushmore

90 N.J.L. 665 | N.J. | 1917

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Stvayze, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppbnhelmer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: Cooney v. Rushmore

Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date Published: Jun 18, 1917

Citation: 90 N.J.L. 665

Court Abbreviation: N.J.