History
  • No items yet
midpage
844 S.W.2d 40
Mo. Ct. App.
1992

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s Rule 24.035 Motion. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Case Details

Case Name: Cooley v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 20, 1992
Citations: 844 S.W.2d 40; 1992 WL 292482; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1599; No. 61378
Docket Number: No. 61378
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Cooley v. State, 844 S.W.2d 40