History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cooley v. Powers
80 Or. App. 591
Or. Ct. App.
1986
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendants appeal from judgments ordering specific performance of a land sale contract, entering judgment for the unpaid balance, ordering a sheriffs sale without right of redemption if the judgment is not paid and specifying that plaintiffs could execute on any deficiency.

Our review of the record convinces us that the remedy of specific performance is not so harsh or oppressive in this case that it should be denied. Renard v. Allen, 237 Or 406, 418, 391 P2d 777 (1964). No statutory right of redemption exists following foreclosure of an equitable vendor’s lien even though the vendor may obtain a deficiency judgment. Emco Investment, Inc. v. Vaden, 60 Or App 762, 655 P2d 220 (1982).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cooley v. Powers
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Aug 6, 1986
Citation: 80 Or. App. 591
Docket Number: 16-84-05906; CA A36246
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.