midpage

Cool v. StateCool v. State

Indiana Supreme Court
Jun 10, 1861
Reporters:
,
Before:
Ouriam
Per Ouriam.

An indictment for retailing liquors should allege a given quantity, ‍‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‍according to established measures, as a pint, a gill, &c., and a price for which it was sold. “ One drink” ‍‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‍signifies no given quantity. Ind. Dig., p. 378; 4 Ind. 577.

The judgment is reversed, with instructions to quash.

Case Details

Case Name: Cool v. State
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 10, 1861
Citations: 16 Ind. 355; 1861 Ind. LEXIS 180
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
Log In