Cooks v. New York City Transit AuthorityCooks v. New York City Transit Authority
In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Executive Law § 296 to recover damages for wrongful discharge from employment based upon race, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an or
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A prior arbitration award, which was confirmed by the Supreme Court, determined that the plaintiff was guilty of misconduct justifying his discharge from employment. Thus, in this action, the plaintiff was precluded from relitigating any matter litigated in the prior arbitration proceeding, including whether the misconduct actually occurred (see, Matter of Metro-N. Commuter R. R. Co. v New York State Executive Dept. Div. of Human Rights,
Once the defendant established that it had valid, nondiscriminatory reasons for discharging the plaintiff from employment, the burden shifted to the plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the stated reasons for his discharge were pretextual for racial discrimination (see, Hall v Paladino,
The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Krausman, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.