History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cook v. Kilgo
111 Ga. 817
Ga.
1900
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

1. An exception to the overruling of a motion to rulé out “all evidence that went behind the settlement,” without setting forth either literally or in substance the evidence referred to, will not be considered. Petty v. Brunswick & W. Ry. Co., 109 Ga. 666, and cases cited.

2. There being no specific assignment of error upon the charge excepted to, *818this court will not consider it further than to determine whether'it states a correct principle of law. Anderson v. Southern Ry. Co., 107 Ga. 500. This charge as an abstract proposition was good law.

Submitted March 14, — Decided April 7, 1900. Complaint. Before Judge Estes. Habersham superior court. March term, 1899. J. G. Edwards and J. W. Owen, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Jones, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Cook v. Kilgo
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 7, 1900
Citation: 111 Ga. 817
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.