Cook v. Kilgo
111 Ga. 817 | Ga. | 1900
1. An exception to the overruling of a motion to rulé out “all evidence that went behind the settlement,” without setting forth either literally or in substance the evidence referred to, will not be considered. Petty v. Brunswick & W. Ry. Co., 109 Ga. 666, and cases cited.
2. There being no specific assignment of error upon the charge excepted to,
Judgment affirmed.