Cook v. First National Bank, No. 9602

No. 9602 | Ga. | Dec 15, 1933

Bell, J.

1. “There is no provision of law for reviewing by writ of error an interlocutory order merely revoking or setting aside a temporary restraining order.” Carolina Portland dement Co. v. Jones, 162 Ga. 591 (134 S.E. 300" court="Ga." date_filed="1926-07-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/carolina-portland-cement-co-v-jones-5585996?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5585996">134 S. E. 300) ; Barrett v. American Securities Co., 173 Ga. 57 (159 S.E. 866" court="Ga." date_filed="1931-07-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/barrett-v-american-securities-co-5588454?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5588454">159 S. E. 866).

2. The only exception in this case is to an order dissolving a previous restraining order, and therefore the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained.

No. 9602. December 15, 1933. H. Cliff Hatcher and Fleming & Fleming, for plaintiff. Fullbright & Burney, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., absent for providential cause.