Coogan v. TorrisiCoogan v. Torrisi
Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellants’ contention that they were deprived of a fair trial because of the alleged prejudicial effect of limited testimony elicited regarding the presence of alcoholic beverages at their home on the day of the accident is unpreserved for appellate review (see Friedman v Marcus, 32 AD3d 820 [2006]; Doyle v Nusser, 288 AD2d 176 [2001]). In any event, reversal would not be warranted on this basis since the appellants failed to establish
It was not error for the court to charge the jury that the appellant John E. Torrisi‘s violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was negligence per se (see