Converse v. . Stewart192 N.Y. 578 NY1908Check TreatmentJudgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the proof fails to establish that defendant was a stockholder of the thresher company at the time of its dissolution and of the decree of the Minnesota courts; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ.
