10 Vt. 578 | Vt. | 1838
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The argument has very properly been confined to a single point, since the case cited, of Converse v. Cook and others, 8 Vt. R. 164, covers every other ground of importance.
It is insisted that the deed of assignment from Rebecca Hapgood and her husband to the plaintiff was void under the statute of 1807, because, at the time of its execution, the defendant was in possession, claiming the land in his own right, and adversely to those grantors. The operation
Judgment of the county court affirmed.