Continental Insurance v. City of RyeContinental Insurance v. City of Rye
—In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered December 1, 1997, which granted the application.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On October 19, 1996, the petitioner’s insured, Paul D. Collins, was in an automobile accident involving three motor
The appellants’ contention that the City of Rye had not received actual notice of the accident within the 90-day statutory period is without merit. Although a police report regarding an automobile accident does not itself constitute notice of the accident to a municipality (see, Matter of Dube v City of New York,
Accordingly, after considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances presented herein, including that there is no prejudice to the appellants, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petitioner’s application. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.