138 So. 921 | Ala. Ct. App. | 1931
The case here is the same and identical case passed on by our Supreme Court styled Cook v. Continental Insurance Company,
In addition to the decision of our Supreme Court above cited and in support of the holding there made, attention is directed to the recent case of Southern Home Insurance Company v. Wall (Miss.)
There is a slight insistence by appellant that error existed on account of the refusal of the court to give certain charges requested by appellant. The principles involved in these charges are embraced in the main issues, and their refusal do not constitute reversible error.
That appellant may not be precluded from further prosecution, we adopt as a statement of facts the same statement as appears in Cook v. Continental Ins. Co., supra.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.