History
  • No items yet
midpage
Continental Fin. Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co.
105 N.J. Super. 406
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1969
|
Check Treatment
105 N.J. Super. 406 (1969)
252 A.2d 417

CONTINENTAL FINANCE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CAMBRIDGE LEE METAL CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 28, 1969.
Decided May 8, 1969.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. William S. Katchen argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Ravin & Ravin, attorneys; Mr. David N. Ravin, of counsel).

Mr. Don Allen Resnikoff, Assistant United States Attorney, argued the cause for respondent United States of America (Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., United States Attorney, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Hand's opinion for the Law Division, as reported in 100 N.J. Super. 327 (1968).

Case Details

Case Name: Continental Fin. Inc. v. Cambridge Lee Metal Co.
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: May 8, 1969
Citation: 105 N.J. Super. 406
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.