These general motions by the plaintiffs involve only the adequacy of the damages assessed by the jury. The other grounds for new trials, which were originally assigned, have been abandoned. The defendant did not file cross motions.
On August 6, 1932, Alice Conroy and Angeline Lee and the latter’s intestate, Albert Morrisettе, were injured when the automobile in which they were riding as passengers collided with a Lincoln touring car driven by the defendant. In each of these actions to recover the damages resulting from the collision, the plaintiff has a verdict.
There is very little, if any, conflict in the evidence as to the injuries which Mrs. Conroy received. Her attending physician states that, when she was brought to the hospital, she had jagged lacerations of the forehead and scalp, was black and blue about the face and bruised there and on the chest, elbows, and at the region of the spine at the shoulder level. He describes the cut on her face as extending perpendicularly down across the forehead and laterally across the eyebrow, making an open wound exposing the skull, and states that, after a period of unconsciousness resulting from a condition of concussion of the brain, Mrs. Conroy suffered much pain, including severe headaches. At the end of a week, she left the
Counsel for this plaintiff presented evidence which tеnded to show that, as a result of this collision, she had incurred expenses aggregating $170. Although no stipulation'was made, the amount and propriety 'of these charges were not disputed at the trial and, in effect, are admitted to be correct on the brief. In addition to these disbursements, she is еntitled to recover for the pain and suffering which resulted from her injuries. The scar upon her forehead is a physical disfigurement which, along with the mental .chagrin, mortification, and discomfort .she endures now and in the future as a direct and natural consequence of it, is an element of damage for which she is entitled to recover. Coombs v. King, 107 Me., 376,
Apрarently, the same course was pursued in the action brought by Angeline Lee as an individual. She sustained a fracture of the right radius close to and lеading into the wrist joint, although there was no displacement and a reduction of the fracture was unnecessary. She was bruised in the region of the lower ribs in front and there was a black and blue spot in the middle of her back. She was in the hospital six days and required more or less treatment thereafter. Her family physician testifies that her injuries were
Albert Morrisette died аs a result of this accident. His neck was broken and his body paralyzed, and yet he remained conscious and rational and lived seven days. His pаin was intense, except as he was relieved by the administration of morphine, and more than once he asked that he be given something to еnd his misery. He knew he was going to die and made his will. The proof is abundant that, until he lapsed into final unconsciousness just prior to death, he was subject to intermittent periods of great mental and physical agony. He was a middle-aged bachelor, employed as a telegraph opеrator, and, except as he suffered from arthritis, appears to have been generally in good health. The verdict given his administratrix was $1,200, of whiсh we must assume $463.94 was for
- We are fully aware that, as a general rule, in the trial of сivil cases the assessment of damages is for the jury and the parties are entitled to their judgment upon that issue. When it appears, however, thаt.the jury have disregarded the testimony or acted under some bias, prejudice, or improper influence, with the result that the damages awardеd are either excessive or inadequate, then it is the duty of the Court to set aside the verdict. This Court has long held that, when the smallness of a verdict shоws that the jury may have made a compromise, a new trial-will be granted. Leavitt v. Dow, 105 Me., 50,
Motion sustained.
New trial granted.