History
  • No items yet
midpage
Conran ex rel. Estate of Conran v. Joe Jenkins Realty, Inc.
210 S.E.2d 309
| S.C. | 1974
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by the appellant-defendant based on objections and exceptions made and taken during the course of the trial. The transcript of record contains no testimony whatsoever as required by Rule 4, Section 3, and Rule 8, Section 7, of thei Rules of The Supreme Court of South Carolina. The appellant has the right to propose the record and designate its contents. The burden of proof is on the appellant to convince this Court that the lower court was in error. In order to do this he must place in the record sufficient testimony to serve as a foundation for his argument, and where, as here, the exceptions require consideration of the trial testimony, which is not included in the record, the appellant thus has not complied with the fundamental rules of this Court. There simply isn’t anything before us from which we could conclude that the lower court should be reversed. The South Carolina National Bank of Charleston v. B. H. Stepp Company, Inc., 248 S. C. 521, 151 S. E. (2d) 752; South Carolina State Highway Department v. Meredith, 241 S. C. 306, 311, 128 S. E. (2d) 179.

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Conran ex rel. Estate of Conran v. Joe Jenkins Realty, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Dec 9, 1974
Citation: 210 S.E.2d 309
Docket Number: 19923
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.