History
  • No items yet
midpage
Conrad v. Broeker
71 N.J.L. 341
N.J.
1904
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The state of the case furnished to the court discloses no exceptions authenticated by the judge upon which error has been assigned. For this omission the court deems it impossible to disturb the judgment, and it must therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray. 11.

For reversal — Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: Conrad v. Broeker
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 30, 1904
Citation: 71 N.J.L. 341
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.