210 S.W. 207 | Tex. Crim. App. | 1919
Appellant was convicted of burglary, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
There is a bill of exceptions complaining of the statement of the court during the examination of the witness Blunt. Without discussing this, we are of opinion it is not of sufficient importance or bearing to require a reversal of the judgment, especially as explained by the court.
Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
<©E5>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes