91 Ala. 265 | Ala. | 1890
Two objections are here urged on the part of Connor to the decree in this cause. First, that it was. error to tax him with one half the costs ; and, second, that the sum of one hundred and seventy-five dollars belonging to the corpus of Mrs. Armstrong’s separate estate, and paid by her husband to Connor before the sale of the land, should have been applied to the first items of the latter’s account, and was in fact so applied at the time of the payment, and should not have been applied, as was done by the decree, to those items only for which Mrs. Armstrong’s separate estate was liable as. for articles of comfort and support of the family, &c.
On the appeal of Connor, the decree of the Chancery Court is reversed, and the cause remanded.
We find no error in the record of which the cross-appellants •can complain, and they will take nothing by their appeal.