History
  • No items yet
midpage
Conner v. Wall
37 Ind. 252
Ind.
1871
Check Treatment
Worden, C. J.

This was an action by the appellee *253against William W. Conner and John C. Conner, upon a promissory note. Finding by the court, and judgment for the plaintiff.

D. Moss, for appellant. J. O'Brien and W. O’Brien, for appellee.

John C. Conner alone appeals, arid assigns for error the following only: ‘fNow comes the appellant and says there is manifest error in the record and proceedings, in this, that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.”

No authorities need be cited to the point that no question is raised by this assignment of error. The error should have' been assigned upon the overruling of a motion for anew trial.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Conner v. Wall
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1871
Citation: 37 Ind. 252
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.