History
  • No items yet
midpage
Connell v. Waddell
26 Ga. App. 307
Ga. Ct. App.
1921
Check Treatment
Jenkins, P. J.

Where proof of service of a bill of exceptions is to the effect that a copy thereof was left at the residence of the attorney for the defendant in error during the attorney’s absence from the county, it must also affirmatively appear that the defendant in error (unless the defendant in error is the State) is a nonresident of the county where the bill of exceptions was sued out. Civil Code (1910), § 6160, subdiv. 2; Bank of S. W. Ga. v. Tillman, 94 Ga. 731 (20 S. E. 4). Such fact of nonresidence not being made to appear in the instant case, the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions must necessarily be granted.

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens and Bill, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Connell v. Waddell
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 15, 1921
Citation: 26 Ga. App. 307
Docket Number: 11655
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.