Conigliaro v. Premier Poultry, Inc.Conigliaro v. Premier Poultry, Inc.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof, in effect, searching the record and awarding summary judgment to the third-party defendant dismissing the third-party cause of action for contribution for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Andrew Conigliaro; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants third-party plaintiffs.
This case involves a motor vehicle accident, in which the plaintiff Andrew Conigliaro, a passenger in a vehicle operated by the plaintiff Joseph Siciliano and owned by the City of New York (hereinafter the City), was injured in a collision with a vehicle operated by the defendant Stephen M. Flynn and owned by the defendant Premier Poultry, Inc. In two actions, which were later consolidated, the plaintiffs sued the defendants Premier Poultry, Inc., and Stephen M. Flynn (hereinafter the appellants). The appellants in turn sought contribution from the plaintiff Joseph Siciliano to the extent that any injuries and damages were found to be due to his comparative negligence, and also commenced a third-party action against the City based
Subsequently, Conigliaro moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Upon granting that motion, the Supreme Court, in effect, searched the record and awarded summary judgment to the City dismissing the third-party complaint.
As the City correctly concedes, this was error (see Mowczan v Bacon, 92 NY2d 281 [1998]). The fact that Conigliaro, as an innocent passenger, was awarded summary judgment as to the appellants’ liability does not preclude a later apportionment of fault between the drivers of the two vehicles involved in the accident (see Garcia v Tri-County Ambulette Serv., 282 AD2d 206 [2001]). Accordingly, the court should not have, in effect, searched the record and awarded summary judgment dismissing the third-party cause of action for contribution asserted against the City, based on its vicarious liability as an owner, for the injuries sustained by Conigliaro to the extent that it could be shown that the plaintiff Joseph Siciliano was comparatively negligent. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Hall, JJ., concur.