History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cones v. Hendry
120 So. 764
Fla.
1929
Check Treatment

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Brett v. First National Bank, decided at the present term.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur. *Page 373

Case Details

Case Name: Cones v. Hendry
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Mar 19, 1929
Citation: 120 So. 764
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.